General Dynamic Triviality Theorems

Philosophical Review 125 (3):307-339 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Famous results by David Lewis show that plausible-sounding constraints on the probabilities of conditionals or evaluative claims lead to unacceptable results, by standard probabilistic reasoning. Existing presentations of these results rely on stronger assumptions than they really need. When we strip these arguments down to a minimal core, we can see both how certain replies miss the mark, and also how to devise parallel arguments for other domains, including epistemic “might,” probability claims, claims about comparative value, and so on. A popular reply to Lewis's results is to claim that conditional claims, or claims about subjective value, lack truth conditions. For this strategy to have a chance of success, it needs to give up basic structural principles about how epistemic states can be updated—in a way that is strikingly parallel to the commitments of the project of dynamic semantics.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RUSGDT-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-03-05
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge and its Limits.Williamson, Timothy
Epistemic Modals.Yalcin, Seth
Knowledge and Its Limits.Williamson, Timothy
Knowledge and Its Limits.Williamson, Timothy

View all 42 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Weak Assertion.Incurvati, Luca & Schlöder, Julian J.
Inferential Expressivism and the Negation Problem.Incurvati, Luca & Schlöder, Julian J.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-09-01

Total views
154 ( #25,514 of 49,069 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
52 ( #12,556 of 49,069 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.