Four Lenses for Designing Morally Engaging Games

Proceedings of 1st International Joint Conference of DiGRA and FDG (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Historically the focus of moral decision-making in games has been narrow, mostly confined to challenges of moral judgement (deciding right and wrong). In this paper, we look to moral psychology to get a broader view of the skills involved in ethical behaviour and how they may be employed in games. Following the Four Component Model of Rest and colleagues, we identify four “lenses” – perspectives for considering moral gameplay in terms of focus, sensitivity, judgement and action – and describe the design problems raised by each. To conclude, we analyse two recent games, The Walking Dead and Papers, Please, and show how the lenses give us insight into important design differences between them.
Keywords
PhilPapers/Archive ID
RYAFLF
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-12-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Moral Stages a Current Formulation and a Response to Critics.Kohlberg, Lawrence; Levine, Charles & Hewer, Alexandra

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Morality Play: A Model for Developing Games of Moral Expertise.Staines, Dan; Formosa, Paul & Ryan, Malcolm
Training Moral Sensitivity Through Video Games: A Review of Suitable Game Mechanisms. [REVIEW]Johannes, Katsarov; Markus, Christen; David, Schmocker; Carmen, Tanner & Ralf, Mauerhofer

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-12-21

Total views
76 ( #37,254 of 50,373 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #25,076 of 50,373 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.