Kant’s Philosophy of Moral Luck

Sophia 60 (2):365-387 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the modern moral luck debate, Kant is standardly taken to be the enemy of moral luck. My goal in this paper is to show that this is mistaken. The paper is divided into six sections. In the first, I show that participants in the moral luck literature take moral luck to be anathema to Kantian ethics. In the second, I explain the kind of luck I am going to focus on here: consequence luck, a species of resultant luck. In the third, I explain why philosophers have taken Kantian ethics to reject moral luck and, in particular, consequence luck. In the fourth, I explain why these philosophers are mistaken, and I set out Kant’s theoretical framework for consequence luck. In the fifth, I clarify and defend this framework, and in the sixth, I interrogate and attack it.

Author's Profile

Samuel J. M. Kahn
Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-02-26

Downloads
1,092 (#16,232)

6 months
319 (#4,986)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?