Does Macbeth See a Dagger? An Empirical Argument for the Existence-Neutrality of Seeing

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In a recent paper, Justin D’Ambrosio (2020) has offered an empirical argument in support of a negative solution to the puzzle of Macbeth’s dagger—namely, the question of whether, in the famous scene from Shakespeare’s play, Macbeth sees a dagger in front of him. D’Ambrosio’s strategy consists in showing that “seeing” is not an existence-neutral verb; that is, that the way it is used in ordinary language is not neutral with respect to whether its complement exists. In this paper, we offer an empirical argument in favor of an existence-neutral reading of “seeing”. In particular, we argue that existence-neutral readings are readily available to language users. We thus call into question D’Ambrosio’s argument for the claim that Macbeth does not see a dagger. According to our positive solution, Macbeth sees a dagger, even though there is not a dagger in front of him.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SANDMS-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-04-10
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-04-10

Total views
154 ( #35,843 of 2,448,737 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
63 ( #9,646 of 2,448,737 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.