The hybrid contents of memory

Synthese 197 (3):1263-1290 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper proposes a novel account of the contents of memory. By drawing on insights from the philosophy of perception, I propose a hybrid account of the contents of memory designed to preserve important aspects of representationalist and relationalist views. The hybrid view I propose also contributes to two ongoing debates in philosophy of memory. First, I argue that, in opposition to eternalist views, the hybrid view offers a less metaphysically-charged solution to the co-temporality problem. Second, I show how the hybrid view conceives of the relationship between episodic memory and other forms of episodic thinking. I conclude by considering some disanalogies between perception and memory and by replying to objections. I argue that, despite there being important differences between memory and perception, those differences do not harm my project.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SANTHC
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-03-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 79 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-03-09

Total views
185 ( #22,470 of 49,088 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #23,870 of 49,088 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.