Cézanne - Van Gogh - Monet. Genese der Abstraktion, second editon of PhD thesis from 1999/2000

Heidelberg: ART-Dok (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Do abstract paintings still make sense and if so what do they mean? By reducing the paintings to simple square blots as by Cézanne, to lines as by van Gogh and color traces as by Monet their meaning is fundamentally questioned. But by interpreting these compositions as effective forces or rather affective stimuli a new and different meaning becomes apparent. Landscapes are no longer introduced but made real in the aesthetic experience. Therefore aesthetics or rather aisthetics (perception) can be defined as a notion of experience and knowledge. Thus the notion of an image gets a new understanding: it can be described as an "energetic system".
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SAUCV-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-12-04
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-12-04

Total views
101 ( #36,737 of 54,694 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #28,019 of 54,694 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.