Warburg und die Natur(-wissenschaft): Affektpsychologische Fundierung von Kultur im Hamburger Kreis um Warburg, Cassirer und Werner und deren Nachwirkungen

Visual Past, 5/2018, Special Issue: Image Senses (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
What distinguishes humans form animals? Acknowledging that humans are part of nature, that can process psychologically their affective-vital reactions to nature, and thus be held responsible for cultural processes, is the result of art historical, cultural-philosophical and life science research over the past two centuries. This line of argumentation led to the consideration that there must also be a connection between affective-psychological reactions and formal, a-historical mechanisms that are usually used by the arts. However, influenced by classical aesthetic theory, no connection to culturally relevant communication processes has been established. It is the concern of the following scientific-historical study to establish this possible connection between the three in retrospect of research from the mid-19th century to the Hamburg circle around the art historian Aby Warburg, the philosopher Ernst Cassirer and the developmental psychologist Heinz Werner in the 1920s and the emergence of embodiment theories in the second half of the 20th century.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-01-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Theorie des Bildakts.Bredekamp, Horst

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
41 ( #43,187 of 48,767 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
41 ( #17,047 of 48,767 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.