The Role of Concepts in Fixing Language

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50 (5):555-565 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This is a contribution to the symposium on Herman Cappelen’s book Fixing Language. Cappelen proposes a metasemantic framework—the “Austerity Framework”—within which to understand the general phenomenon of conceptual engineering. The proposed framework is austere in the sense that it makes no reference to concepts. Conceptual engineering is then given a “worldly” construal according to which conceptual engineering is a process that operates on the world. I argue, contra Cappelen, that an adequate theory of conceptual engineering must make reference to concepts. This is because concepts are required to account for topic continuity, a phenomenon which lies at the heart of projects in conceptual engineering. I argue that Cappelen’s own account of topic continuity is inadequate as a result of the austerity of his metasemantic framework, and that his worldly construal of conceptual engineering is untenable.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
2020
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SAWTRO-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-02-26
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-02-15

Total views
300 ( #15,969 of 52,780 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
83 ( #6,223 of 52,780 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.