The role of concepts in fixing language

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This is a contribution to the symposium on Herman Cappelen’s Fixing Language. Cappelen proposes a metasemantic framework—the ‘Austerity Framework’—within which to understand the general phenomenon of conceptual engineering. The proposed framework is austere in the sense that it makes no reference to concepts. Conceptual engineering is then given a ‘worldly’ construal according to which conceptual engineering is a process that operates on the world. I argue, contra Cappelen, that an adequate theory of conceptual engineering must make reference to concepts. This is because concepts are required to account for topic continuity, a phenomenon which lies at the heart of projects in conceptual engineering. I argue that Cappelen’s own account of topic continuity is inadequate as a result of the austerity of his metasemantic framework, and that his worldly construal of conceptual engineering is untenable.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
2019
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SAWTRO-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-02-26
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Extended Mind.Clark, Andy & Chalmers, David J.
Relativism and Monadic Truth.Cappelen, Herman & Hawthorne, John
Verbal Disputes.Chalmers, David J.
Semantic Plasticity and Speech Reports.Dorr, Cian & Hawthorne, John

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-02-15

Total views
179 ( #20,616 of 45,387 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
92 ( #6,410 of 45,387 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.