Can reproductive genetic manipulation save lives?

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
It has recently been argued that reproductive genetic manipulation technologies like mitochondrial replacement and germline CRISPR modifications cannot be said to save anyone’s life because, counterfactually, no one would suffer more or die sooner absent the intervention. The present article argues that, on the contrary, reproductive genetic manipulations may be life-saving (and, from this, have therapeutic value) under an appropriate population health perspective. As such, popular reports of reproductive genetic manipulations potentially saving lives or preventing disease are not necessarily mistaken, though such terminology still requires further empirical validation.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-04-01
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
339 ( #19,798 of 64,124 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
49 ( #15,633 of 64,124 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.