How to Distinguish Parthood from Location in Bioontologies

In Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium. American Medical Informatics Association. pp. 669-673 (2005)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The pivotal role of the relation part-of in the description of living organisms is widely acknowledged. Organisms are open systems, which means that in contradistinction to mechanical artifacts they are characterized by a continuous flow and exchange of matter. A closer analysis of the spatial relations in biological organisms reveals that the decision as to whether a given particular is part-of a second particular or whether it is only contained-in the second particular is often controversial. We here propose a rule-based approach which allows us to decide on the basis of well-defined criteria which of the two relations holds between two anatomical objects, given that one spatially includes the other. We discuss the advantages and limitations of this approach, using concrete examples from human anatomy.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-08-09
View upload history
Chapters BETA
References found in this work BETA
SNAP and SPAN: Towards Dynamic Spatial Ontology.Pierre Grenon & Barry Smith - 2004 - Spatial Cognition and Computation 4 (1):69–103.
The Role of Foundational Relations in the Alignment of Biomedical Ontologies.Barry Smith & Cornelius Rosse - 2004 - In M. Fieschi, E. Coiera & Y.-C. J. Li (eds.), Medinfo. IOS Press. pp. 444-448.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Anatomical Information Science.Smith, Barry; Mejino, Jose; Schulz, Stefan; Kumar, Anand & Rosse, Cornelius

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
62 ( #39,750 of 50,290 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #46,940 of 50,290 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.