Moral Vagueness Is Ontic Vagueness

Ethics 126 (2):257-282 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this essay is to argue that, if a robust form of moral realism is true, then moral vagueness is ontic vagueness. The argument is by elimination: I show that neither semantic nor epistemic approaches to moral vagueness are satisfactory

Author's Profile

Miriam Schoenfield
University of Texas at Austin

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-12-18

Downloads
497 (#28,950)

6 months
185 (#11,604)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?