Presenters or Patients? A Crucial Distinction in Individual Health Assessments

Asian Bioethics Review 10 (1):67-73 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Individual health assessments (IHAs) for asymptomatic individuals provide a challenge to traditional distinctions between patient care and non-medical practice. They may involve undue radiation exposure, lead to false positives, and involve high out-of-pocket costs for recipients. A recent paper (Journal of the American College of Radiology 13(12): 1447–1457.e1, 2016) has criticised the use of IHAs and argued that recipients should be classified as ‘presenters’, not ‘patients’, to distinguish it from regular medical care. I critique this classificatory move, on two grounds: one, it is conceptually suspect. Two, it obviates the medical ethics framework for IHAs, potentially exposing recipients of IHAs to lower standards of oversight and protection. Responsible regulation of IHAs will be easier to ethically justify if those seeking IHAs are considered patients and not merely presenters.
Categories
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SCHPOP-18
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-06-01
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Gray Zones of Privatized Imaging.Lau, Patricia W. & Illes, Judy

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-06-01

Total views
112 ( #31,308 of 50,115 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #18,514 of 50,115 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.