Questions: An essay in Daubertian phenomenology

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
A number of logicians and philosophers have turned their attention in recent years to the problem of developing a logic of interrogatives. Their work has thrown a great deal of light on the formal properties of questions and question-sentences and has led also to interesting innovations in our understanding of the structures of performatives in general and, for example, in the theory of presuppositions. When, however, we examine the attempts of logicians such as Belnap or Åqvist to specify what, precisely, a question is, or what it is to ask or raise a question, then what we are offered is somewhat less illuminating. Two alternative reductionist accounts seem in particular to have gained most favor: questions are identified either as special sorts of statements, or as special sorts of requests. As we hope will become clear in what follows, neither of these accounts is even nearly adequate; and matters are not improved if questions are identified, by force majeure, as combinations of statements and requests
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 2 (2017-10-30)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Logische Untersuchungen.Husserl, Edmund (ed.)
The Phenomenological Movement.Spiegelberg, Herbert

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
A Theory of Granular Partitions.Bittner, Thomas & Smith, Barry
Applied Ontology: An Introduction.Munn, Katherine & Smith, Barry (eds.)

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
599 ( #4,819 of 43,716 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
125 ( #3,658 of 43,716 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.