Robustness Analysis as Explanatory Reasoning

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
When scientists seek further confirmation of their results, they often attempt to duplicate the results using diverse means. To the extent that they are successful in doing so, their results are said to be robust. This paper investigates the logic of such "robustness analysis" [RA]. The most important and challenging question an account of RA can answer is what sense of evidential diversity is involved in RAs. I argue that prevailing formal explications of such diversity are unsatisfactory. I propose a unified, explanatory account of diversity in RAs. The resulting account is, I argue, truer to actual cases of RA in science; moreover, this account affords us a helpful, new foothold on the logic undergirding RAs.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SCHRAA-15
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Robustness Analysis.Weisberg, Michael
The Logic of Explanatory Power.Schupbach, Jonah N. & Sprenger, Jan

View all 37 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Robustness and Independent Evidence.Stegenga, Jacob & Menon, Tarun

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-10-07

Total views
395 ( #8,602 of 43,761 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
66 ( #9,884 of 43,761 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.