Repliek op de kritiek van de Boer, Blomme, van den Berg en Spigt

Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 80 (2):363-378 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, I respond to critiques of my book Kant’s Radical Subjectivism: Perspectives on the Transcendental Deduction (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017). I address issues that are raised concerning objectivity, the nature of the object, the role of transcendental apperception and the imagination, and idealism. More in particular I respond to an objection against my reading of the necessary existence of things in themselves and their relation to appearances. I also briefly respond to a question that relates to the debate on Kantian nonconceptualism, more in particular, the question whether Kant allows animals objective intentionality. Lastly, I respond to one objection against my reading of Hegel’s critique of Kant. (The copy uploaded here is an English translation of the original Dutch version that is published in the journal.)

Author's Profile

Dennis Schulting
University of Warwick (PhD)

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-12

Downloads
572 (#26,970)

6 months
89 (#44,170)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?