Thinking about Values in Science: Ethical versus Political Approaches

Canadian Journal of Philosophy:1-10 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Philosophers of science now broadly agree that doing good science involves making non-epistemic value judgments. I call attention to two very different normative standards which can be used to evaluate such judgments: standards grounded in ethics and standards grounded in political philosophy. Though this distinction has not previously been highlighted, I show that the values in science literature contain arguments of each type. I conclude by explaining why this distinction is important. Seeking to determine whether some value-laden determination meets substantive ethical standards is a very different endeavor from seeking to determine if it is politically legitimate.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-10-10
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
154 ( #33,343 of 2,432,431 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
63 ( #11,319 of 2,432,431 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.