There Is No Knowledge From Falsehood

Episteme 12 (1):53-74 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
A growing number of authors defend putative examples of knowledge from falsehood (KFF), inferential knowledge based in a critical or essential way on false premises, and they argue that KFF has important implications for many areas of epistemology (whether evidence can be false, the Gettier debate, defeasibility theories of knowledge, etc.). I argue, however, that there is no KFF, because in any supposed example either the falsehood does not contribute to the knowledge or the subject lacks knowledge. In particular, I show that if the subject actually has knowledge in putative KFF cases, then there is always a veridical evidential path meeting the basing conditions that accounts for her knowledge; if there is no such path, then the subject is in a type of Gettier case. All the recent arguments that rely on KFF are therefore based on a mistake.
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Normativity and Epistemic Intuitions.Weinberg, Jonathan M.; Nichols, Shaun & Stich, Stephen
Knowledge and its Limits.Williamson, Timothy

View all 32 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Revisiting Knowledge From Falsehood.Rodrigues, Tiegue Vieira
A Dilemma for the Knowledge Despite Falsehood Strategy.Buford, Christopher & Michael Cloos, Christopher

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
382 ( #9,011 of 43,872 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
65 ( #10,034 of 43,872 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.