The paradox of ineffability

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Saying that x is ineffable seems to be paradoxical – either I cannot say anything about x, not even that it is ineffable – or I can say that it is ineffable, but then I can say something and it is not ineffable. In this article, I discuss Alston’s version of the paradox and a solution proposed by Hick which employs the concept of formal and substantial predicates. I reject Hick’s proposal and develop a different account based on some passages from Pseudo-Dionysius’ Mystica Theologia. ‘God is ineffable’ is a metalinguistic statement concerning propositions about God: not all propositions about God are expressible in a human language.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-03-21
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
358 ( #21,110 of 69,009 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
97 ( #7,215 of 69,009 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.