Catastrophe ethics and activist speech: Reflections on moral norms, advocacy, and technical judgment

Metaphilosophy 42 (1-2):118-144 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstract: This essay critically examines whether there are ethical dimensions to the way that expertise, knowledge claims, and expressions of skepticism intersect on technical matters that influence public policy, especially during times of crisis. It compares two different perspectives on the matter: a philosophical outlook rooted in discourse and virtue ethics and a sociological outlook rooted in the so-called third-wave approach to science studies. The comparison occurs through metaphilosophical analysis and applied claims that clarify how the disciplinary orientations appear to lead to different judgments about matters related to Robert Paarlberg's condemnation of activists who advise African politicians to ban genetically modified food.

Author Profiles

Paul B. Thompson
Michigan State University
Evan Selinger
Rochester Institute of Technology

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-11

Downloads
146 (#98,850)

6 months
57 (#98,589)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?