Fictional Truth in Digital Cinema: A Criticism against John Dilworth

Abstract

In digital cinema, the ambiguity in the concept of representation asks us: How do moving pictures represent fictional objects? I am more concerned in the veracity of fictional objects than the representational theory of how fictional objects are generated. I claim that John Dilworth’s framework is uncritical, therefore, I will adopt an account of truth in fiction according to David Lewis. The purposes of this paper are: (1) to criticize John Dilworth’s framework, and (2) to provide Lewis’s theory as an alternative solution in understanding the veracity of fictional objects.

Author's Profile

Carmina Sera Jose
De La Salle University

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-30

Downloads
329 (#65,946)

6 months
90 (#63,879)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?