Karl Popper’s demarcation problem

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Karl Popper, as a critical rationalist, was an opponent of all forms of skepticism, conventionalism and relativism in science. A major argument of Popper is Hume's critique of induction, arguing that induction should never be used in science. But he disagrees with the skepticism associated with Hume, nor with the support of Bacon and Newton's pure "observation" as a starting point in the formation of theories, as there are no pure observations that do not imply certain theories. Instead, Popper proposes falsifiability as a method of scientific investigation. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11481.36967
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SFEKPD
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-02-10
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-02-10

Total views
915 ( #4,185 of 55,926 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
515 ( #580 of 55,926 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.