A Paradox for Possible World Semantics

Logique Et Analyse 49 (195):307-317 (2006)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The development of possible worlds semantics for modal claims has led to a more general application of that theory as a complete semantics for various formal and natural languages, and this view is widely held to be an adequate (philosophical) interpretation of the model theory for such languages. We argue here that this view generates a self-referential inconsistency that indicates either the falsity or the incompleteness of PWS.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SHAAPF
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-07-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
General Semantics.Lewis, David K.
Assertion.Stalnaker, Robert

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-08-05

Total views
17 ( #41,008 of 42,401 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #41,293 of 42,401 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.