Approximate Truth, Quasi-Factivity, and Evidence

Acta Analytica 30 (3):249-266 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The main question addressed in this paper is whether some false sentences can constitute evidence for the truth of other propositions. In this paper it is argued that there are good reasons to suspect that at least some false propositions can constitute evidence for the truth of certain other contingent propositions. The paper also introduces a novel condition concerning propositions that constitute evidence that explains a ubiquitous evidential practice and it contains a defense of a particular condition concerning the possession of evidence. The core position adopted here then is that false propositions that are approximately true reports of measurements can constitute evidence for the truth of other propositions. So, it will be argued that evidence is only quasi-factive in this very specific sense

Author's Profile

Michael Shaffer
Gustavus Adolphus College

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-11-04

Downloads
586 (#23,509)

6 months
115 (#26,572)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?