Approximate Truth, Quasi-Factivity, and Evidence

Acta Analytica 30 (3):249-266 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The main question addressed in this paper is whether some false sentences can constitute evidence for the truth of other propositions. In this paper it is argued that there are good reasons to suspect that at least some false propositions can constitute evidence for the truth of certain other contingent propositions. The paper also introduces a novel condition concerning propositions that constitute evidence that explains a ubiquitous evidential practice and it contains a defense of a particular condition concerning the possession of evidence. The core position adopted here then is that false propositions that are approximately true reports of measurements can constitute evidence for the truth of other propositions. So, it will be argued that evidence is only quasi-factive in this very specific sense
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-07-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge in an Uncertain World.Fantl, Jeremy & McGrath, Matthew
Knowledge and its Limits.Williamson, Timothy
Knowledge and Action.Hawthorne, John & Stanley, Jason

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Inferentialism, Degrees of Commitment, and Ampliative Donato, Rodríguez Xavier; Zamora, Bonilla Jesús & González De Prado Salas, Javier

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
134 ( #22,060 of 42,382 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
52 ( #12,410 of 42,382 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.