Bealer on the autonomy of philosophical and scientific knowledge

Metaphilosophy 38 (1):44–54 (2007)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In a series of influential articles, George Bealer argues for the autonomy of philosophical knowledge on the basis that philosophically known truths must be necessary truths. The main point of his argument is that the truths investigated by the sciences are contingent truths to be discovered a posteriori by observation, while the truths of philosophy are necessary truths to be discovered a priori by intuition. The project of assimilating philosophy to the sciences is supposed to be rendered illegitimate by the more or less sharp distinction in these characteristic methods and its modal basis. In this article Bealer's particular way of drawing the distinction between philosophy and science is challenged in a novel manner, and thereby philosophical naturalism is further defended
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-07-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Naming and Necessity.Kripke, Saul A.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
118 ( #30,553 of 50,209 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #45,590 of 50,209 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.