Davidson's no-priority thesis in defending the Turing Test

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Turing does not provide an explanation for substituting the original question of his test – i.e., “Can machines think?” with “Can a machine pass the imitation game?” – resulting in an argumentative gap in his main thesis. In this article, I argue that a positive answer to the second question would mean attributing the ability of linguistic interactions to machines; while a positive answer to the original question would mean attributing the ability of thinking to machines. In such a situation, defending the Turing Test requires establishing a relationship between thought and language. In this regard, Davidson's no-priority theory is presented as an approach for defending the test.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-01-03
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Thought and Talk.Davidson, Donald
Radical Interpretation.Davidson, Donald
Turing's Test.Davidson, Donald

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
62 ( #30,758 of 41,508 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
56 ( #10,516 of 41,508 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.