The apparent illusion of conscious deciding

Philosophical Explorations 16 (1):18 - 30 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Recent work in cognitive science suggests that conscious thought plays a much less central role in the production of human behavior than most think. Partially on the basis of this work, Peter Carruthers has advanced the claim that humans never consciously decide to act. This claim is of independent interest for action theory, and its potential truth poses a problem for theories of free will and autonomy, which often take our capacity to consciously decide to be of central importance. In this article, I examine the nature of conscious deciding and I argue that Carruthers fails to establish the claim that humans never consciously decide to act
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Visual Brain in Action.Milner, A. David & Goodale, Melvyn A.

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
463 ( #5,547 of 39,657 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
50 ( #9,457 of 39,657 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.