Response-Dependent Responsibility; or, A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Blame

Philosophical Review 126 (4):481-527 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This essay attempts to provide and defend what may be the first actual argument in support of P. F. Strawson's merely stated vision of a response-dependent theory of moral responsibility. It does so by way of an extended analogy with the funny. In part 1, it makes the easier and less controversial case for response-dependence about the funny. In part 2, it shows the tight analogy between anger and amusement in developing the harder and more controversial case for response-dependence about a kind of blameworthiness. It then defends the view from three serious skeptical challenges.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SHORRO
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-06-02
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-11-08

Total views
356 ( #13,647 of 53,509 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
76 ( #7,337 of 53,509 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.