Response-Dependent Responsibility; or, A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Blame

Philosophical Review 126 (4):481-527 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This essay attempts to provide and defend what may be the first actual argument in support of P. F. Strawson's merely stated vision of a response-dependent theory of moral responsibility. It does so by way of an extended analogy with the funny. In part 1, it makes the easier and less controversial case for response-dependence about the funny. In part 2, it shows the tight analogy between anger and amusement in developing the harder and more controversial case for response-dependence about a kind of blameworthiness. It then defends the view from three serious skeptical challenges.
No keywords specified (fix it)
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-06-02
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
How the Mind Works.Pinker, Steven
The Emotions.Frijda, Nico H.

View all 77 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Comparative Nonarbitrariness Norm of Blame.Telech, Daniel & Tierney, Hannah
The Facts and Practices of Moral Responsibility.De Mesel, Benjamin & Heyndels, Sybren

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
182 ( #18,989 of 43,851 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
70 ( #8,992 of 43,851 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.