The Asymmetrical Contributions of Pleasure and Pain to Animal Welfare

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Recent results from the neurosciences demonstrate that pleasure and pain are not two symmetrical poles of a single scale of experience but in fact two different types of experiences altogether, with dramatically different contributions to well-being. These differences between pleasure and pain and the general finding that “the bad is stronger than the good” have important implications for our treatment of nonhuman animals. In particular, whereas animal experimentation that causes suffering might be justified if it leads to the prevention of more suffering, it can never by justified merely by leading to increased levels of happiness
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SHRTAC
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Practical Ethics.Fischer, John Martin & Singer, Peter
Minding Mammals.Shriver, Adam
The Methods of Ethics.Sidgwick, Henry

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-02-12

Total views
920 ( #2,435 of 43,016 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
132 ( #3,198 of 43,016 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.