Discurso 50 (2):78-96 (
2020)
Copy
BIBTEX
Abstract
This article deals with two questions: why would the way in which the neopyrronicle
conducts his philosophical activity be more virtuous than his dogmatic, non-pyrrhic colleague does? And why would the result he achieves be more valuable? That said, my answer to the first question is that the way the neo-Pyrrhonian investigates is more virtuous because it seeks to deliberately avoid the vices of precipitation, arrogance and mental
closure. Regarding the second question, I
suggest that the outcome of the neopyronic
investigation, whatever it may be (even if it
is not the truth) is more valuable because of
the way he conducts his investigation.