The Conscious Theory of Higher-Orderness

Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Mind (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The massive debate in philosophy and psychology and neuroscience about higher-order theories of consciousness has not adequately distinguished between the following two claims. (Necessary Awareness): For any conscious mental state M and subject S, if S is in M, then S is aware of M. (The Higher-Order Theory): For any conscious mental state M and subject S, if S is in M, then M is conscious because S is aware of M. While I will assume that the first claim is true, I will argue that we should reject higher-order theories of consciousness. We should turn them on their head to go with the following theory: (The Ascending Road): For any conscious mental state M and subject S, if S is in M, then S is aware of M because M is conscious.

Author's Profile

Nicholas Silins
Cornell University

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-08-04

Downloads
425 (#55,642)

6 months
154 (#22,881)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?