Theories of vagueness and theories of law

Legal Theory 25 (2):132-152 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
It is common to think that what theory of linguistic vagueness is correct has implications for debates in philosophy of law. I disagree. I argue that the implications of particular theories of vagueness on substantive issues of legal theory and practice are less far-reaching than often thought. I focus on four putative implications discussed in the literature concerning (i) the value of vagueness in the law, (ii) the possibility and value of legal indeterminacy, (iii) the possibility of the rule of law, and (iv) strong discretion. I conclude with some methodological remarks. Delineating questions about conventional meaning, the metaphysics/metasemantics of (legal) content determination, and norms of legal interpretation and judicial practice can motivate clearer answers and a more refined understanding of the space of overall theories of vagueness, interpretation, and law.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SILTOV
Upload history
First archival date: 2019-01-25
Latest version: 2 (2019-02-01)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-01-25

Total views
576 ( #8,839 of 58,398 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
88 ( #7,344 of 58,398 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.