Commentary on Vallejo: the Ontology of False Pleasures in the Philebus

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In his rich and suggestive paper, Alvaro Vallejo argues for the novel thesis that Plato posits a form of pleasure in the Republic and the Philebus. Vallejo argues that the notion of a Platonic form of pleasure best explains other things that Plato says about pleasure. First, Plato draws a distinction between true pleasure and the appearance of pleasure. Second, Plato uses the same language to describe the relationship between forms and their inferior instantiations as he uses to describe the relationship between true and false pleasures. In these comments, I argue that we do not need to posit a form of pleasure to explain these features of the text. Moreover, I argue that on Vallejo’s account of the form of pleasure, the form could not do the job required of it, namely, it could not explain the problem with false pleasures.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-11-22
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
3 ( #65,784 of 64,254 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #62,312 of 64,254 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.