Distinguishing Belief and Imagination

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (2):152-165 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Some philosophers (including Urmson, Humberstone, Shah, and Velleman) hold that believing that p distinctively involves applying a norm according to which the truth of p is a criterion for the success or correctness of the attitude. On this view, imagining and assuming differ from believing in that no such norm is applied. I argue against this view with counterexamples showing that applying the norm of truth is neither necessary nor sufficient for distinguishing believing from imagining and assuming. Then I argue that the different functional properties of these mental states are enough to distinguish them, and that norm-application doesn't help us draw the functional distinctions
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SINDBA
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 3 (2015-11-21)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Biased by Our Imaginings.Sullivan‐Bissett, Ema

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-03-13

Total views
2,442 ( #346 of 37,203 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
318 ( #851 of 37,203 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.