Cancellation, Negation, and Rejection

Cognitive Psychology 108:42-71 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this paper, new evidence is presented for the assumption that the reason-relation reading of indicative conditionals ('if A, then C') reflects a conventional implicature. In four experiments, it is investigated whether relevance effects found for the probability assessment of indicative conditionals (Skovgaard-Olsen, Singmann, and Klauer, 2016a) can be classified as being produced by a) a conversational implicature, b) a (probabilistic) presupposition failure, or c) a conventional implicature. After considering several alternative hypotheses and the accumulating evidence from other studies as well, we conclude that the evidence is most consistent with the Relevance Effect being the outcome of a conventional implicature. This finding indicates that the reason-relation reading is part of the semantic content of indicative conditionals, albeit not part of their primary truth-conditional content.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-11-25
Latest version: 3 (2018-12-30)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Deduction.Johnson-Laird, P. N. & Byrne, Ruth M. J.
Conversational Implicatures.Blome-Tillmann, Michael

View all 50 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Dialogical Entailment Task.Skovgaard-Olsen, Niels
Norm Conflicts and Conditionals.Skovgaard-Olsen, Niels; Kellen, David; Hahn, Ulrike & Klauer, Karl Christoph

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
129 ( #21,878 of 41,572 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
74 ( #7,076 of 41,572 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.