Mind the Gaps: Ethical and Epistemic Issues in the Digital Mental Health Response to Covid‐19

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Well before the COVID-19 pandemic, proponents of digital psychiatry were touting the promise of various digital tools and techniques to revolutionize mental healthcare. As social distancing and its knock-on effects have strained existing mental health infrastructures, calls have grown louder for implementing various digital mental health solutions at scale. Decisions made today will shape the future of mental healthcare for the foreseeable future. We argue that bioethicists are uniquely positioned to cut through the hype surrounding digital mental health, which can obscure crucial ethical and epistemic gaps that ought to be considered by policymakers before committing to a digital psychiatric future. Here, we describe four such gaps: The evidence gap, the inequality gap, the prediction-intervention gap, and the safety gap.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SKOMTG
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-09-14
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-09-14

Total views
14 ( #62,560 of 2,446,219 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #41,498 of 2,446,219 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.