Macromolecular Pluralism

Philosophy of Science 76 (5):851-863 (2009)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Different chemical species are often cited as paradigm examples of structurally delimited natural kinds. While classificatory monism may thus seem plausible for simple molecules, it looks less attractive for complex biological macromolecules. I focus on the case of proteins that are most plausibly individuated by their functions. Is there a single, objective count of proteins? I argue that the vagaries of function individuation infect protein classification. We should be pluralists about macromolecular classification.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SLAMPF
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
290 ( #17,498 of 54,440 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #32,725 of 54,440 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.