Macromolecular Pluralism

Philosophy of Science 76 (5):851-863 (2009)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Different chemical species are often cited as paradigm examples of structurally delimited natural kinds. While classificatory monism may thus seem plausible for simple molecules, it looks less attractive for complex biological macromolecules. I focus on the case of proteins that are most plausibly individuated by their functions. Is there a single, objective count of proteins? I argue that the vagaries of function individuation infect protein classification. We should be pluralists about macromolecular classification.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Functional Analysis.Cummins, Robert
Functions.Wright, Larry
Function Without Purpose.Amundson, Ron & Lauder, George V.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Natural Kinds.Brzovińá, Zdenka
Messy Chemical Kinds.Havstad, Joyce C.
Biochemical Kinds.Bartol, Jordan

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
238 ( #13,173 of 40,753 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #31,096 of 40,753 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.