A New Epistemic Argument for Idealism

In Tyron Goldschmidt & Kenneth Pearce (eds.), Idealism: New Essays in Metaphysics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 17-33 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Many idealists have thought that realism raises epistemological problems. The worry is that, if it is possible for truths about ordinary objects to outstrip our experiences in the ways that realists typically suppose, we could never be justified in our beliefs about objects. Few contemporary theorists find this argument convincing; philosophers have offered a variety of responses to defend the epistemology of our object judgments under the assumption of realism. But in this paper, I offer a new type of epistemic argument against realism which is immune to the standard responses in the literature. In addition to raising a challenge for realism, the epistemology of our object judgments has implications for how the idealist should develop her own positive metaphysical view. So in the second half of this paper, I discuss how the idealist should understand the dependence between objects and our experiences if she is to secure epistemic advantages over the realist.
Keywords
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SMIANE-2
Revision history
First archival date: 2016-03-14
Latest version: 2 (2018-06-12)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
An Idealist Critique of Naturalism.Robert Smithson - 2018 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 1 (Online):1-23.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-03-14

Total views
180 ( #14,204 of 37,210 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
59 ( #5,877 of 37,210 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.