Ontological realism: A methodology for coordinated evolution of scientific ontologies

Applied Ontology 5 (3):139-188 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Since 2002 we have been testing and refining a methodology for ontology development that is now being used by multiple groups of researchers in different life science domains. Gary Merrill, in a recent paper in this journal, describes some of the reasons why this methodology has been found attractive by researchers in the biological and biomedical sciences. At the same time he assails the methodology on philosophical grounds, focusing specifically on our recommendation that ontologies developed for scientific purposes should be constructed in such a way that their terms are seen as referring to what we call universals or types in reality. As we show, Merrill’s critique is of little relevance to the success of our realist project, since it not only reveals no actual errors in our work but also criticizes views on universals that we do not in fact hold. However, it nonetheless provides us with a valuable opportunity to clarify the realist methodology, and to show how some of its principles are being applied, especially within the framework of the OBO (Open Biomedical Ontologies) Foundry initiative.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SMIORA-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-08-09
View other versions
Added to PP index
2010-12-22

Total views
143 ( #30,391 of 54,381 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #27,698 of 54,381 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.