Why Polish philosophy does not exist

In J. Jadacki & J. Pasniczek (eds.), Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, vol. 89. Reidel. pp. 19-39 (2006)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Why have Polish philosophers fared so badly as concerns their admission into the pantheon of Continental Philosophers? Why, for example, should Heidegger and Derrida be included in this pantheon, but not Ingarden or Tarski? Why, to put the question from another side, should there be so close an association in Poland between philosophy and logic, and between philosophy and science? We distinguish a series of answers to this question, which are dealt with under the following headings: (a) the role of socialism; (b) the disciplinary association between philosophy and mathematics; (c) the influence of Austrian philosophy in general and of Brentanian philosophy in particular; (d) the serendipitous role of Twardowski; (e) the role of Catholicism. The conclusion of the paper is that there is no such thing as 'Polish philosophy' because philosophy in Poland is philosophy per se; it is part and parcel of the mainstream of world philosophy simply because, in contrast to French or German philosophy, it meets international standards of training, rigour, professionalism and specialization.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SMIWPP
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-07-22
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics.Turquette, Atwell; Tarski, Alfred & Woodger, J. H.

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-07-02

Total views
61 ( #32,684 of 42,921 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #23,794 of 42,921 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.