What Remains of Our Knowledge of Language?

Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (22):557-75 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The new Chomskian orthodoxy denies that our linguistic competence gives us knowledge *of* a language, and that the representations in the language faculty are representations *of* anything. In reply, I have argued that through their intuitions speaker/hearers, (but not their language faculties) have knowledge of language, though not of any externally existing language. In order to count as knowledge, these intuitions must track linguistic facts represented in the language faculty. I defend this idea against the objections Collins has raised to such an account.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SMIWRO
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-02-07

Total downloads
397 ( #5,907 of 37,117 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #15,674 of 37,117 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.