What Remains of Our Knowledge of Language? Reply to Collins

Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (22):557-75 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The new Chomskian orthodoxy denies that our linguistic competence gives us knowledge *of* a language, and that the representations in the language faculty are representations *of* anything. In reply, I have argued that through their intuitions speaker/hearers, (but not their language faculties) have knowledge of language, though not of any externally existing language. In order to count as knowledge, these intuitions must track linguistic facts represented in the language faculty. I defend this idea against the objections Collins has raised to such an account.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
484 ( #12,097 of 2,439,406 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #49,098 of 2,439,406 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.