Contractualism for Us As We Are

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
A difficult problem for contractualists is how to provide an interpretation of the contractual situation that is both subject to appropriately stringent constraints and yet also appropriately sensitive to certain features of us as we actually are. My suggestion is that we should embrace a model of contractualism that is structurally analogous to the “advice model” of the ideal observer theory famously proposed by Michael Smith (1994; 1995). An advice model of contractualism is appealing since it promises to deliver a straightforward solution to the so-called “conditional fallacy.” But it faces some formidable challenges. On the face of it, it seems to be straightforwardly conceptually incoherent. And it seems to deliver a solution to the conditional fallacy at the cost of being vulnerable to what I shall call “the concessional fallacy.” I shall consider how, if at all, these challenges are to be met. I shall then conclude by considering what this might mean for the so-called “ideal/non-ideal theory” issue.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SOUCFU
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-04-23
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
What We Owe to Each Other.Scanlon, Thomas M.
The Moral Problem.Lenman, James

View all 44 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-03-30

Total views
192 ( #22,217 of 49,975 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #18,737 of 49,975 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.