Republican justice

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 18 (6):669-678 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX


I raise three objections to Pettit’s republican account of justice: 1) that it fails to account adequately for the role of certain values such as substantive fairness; 2) that it represents an uncomfortable hybrid of egalitarianism and sufficientarianism; and 3) that it fails Pettit’s own “eyeball test”. I then conclude in a more constructive vein, speculating about the kind of account of justice it is supposed to be and suggesting that, construed a certain way, it may have resources for answering the three objections.

Author's Profile

Nicholas Southwood
Australian National University


Added to PP

279 (#34,003)

6 months
19 (#64,327)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?