Cognitive Penetration and Attention

Frontiers in Psychology 8:1-12 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Zenon Pylyshyn argues that cognitively driven attentional effects do not amount to cognitive penetration of early vision because such effects occur either before or after early vision. Critics object that in fact such effects occur at all levels of perceptual processing. We argue that Pylyshyn’s claim is correct—but not for the reason he emphasizes. Even if his critics are correct that attentional effects are not external to early vision, these effects do not satisfy Pylyshyn’s requirements that the effects be direct and exhibit semantic coherence. In addition, we distinguish our defense from those found in recent work by Raftopoulos and by Firestone and Scholl, argue that attention should not be assimilated to expectation, and discuss alternative characterizations of cognitive penetrability, advocating a kind of pluralism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-02-22
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Modularity of Mind.Cummins, Robert & Fodor, Jerry

View all 37 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Attention and Encapsulation.Quilty‐Dunn, Jake

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
136 ( #22,447 of 43,016 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
62 ( #9,969 of 43,016 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.