Sex selection in India: Why a ban is not justified

Developing World Bioethics 20 (3):150-156 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
When widespread use of sex‐selective abortion and sex selection through assisted reproduction lead to severe harms to third parties and perpetuate discrimination, should these practices be banned? In this paper I focus on India and show why a common argument for a ban on sex selection fails even in these circumstances. I set aside a common objection to the argument, namely that women have a right to procreative autonomy that trumps the state's interest in protecting other parties from harm, and argue against the ban on consequentialist grounds. I perform a pairwise comparative analysis of sex selection and its plausible alternatives and argue that that the ban fails to improve the state of affairs relative to a scenario without a ban. The ban makes the situation worse, especially for mothers and their daughters. India should therefore repeal its ban on sex selection.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
STESSI-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-10-25
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-10-23

Total views
76 ( #50,262 of 64,124 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #58,515 of 64,124 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.