Three Criteria for Consensus Conferences

Foundations of Science 21 (1):35-49 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Consensus conferences are social techniques which involve bringing together a group of scientific experts, and sometimes also non-experts, in order to increase the public role in science and related policy, to amalgamate diverse and often contradictory evidence for a hypothesis of interest, and to achieve scientific consensus or at least the appearance of consensus among scientists. For consensus conferences that set out to amalgamate evidence, I propose three desiderata: Inclusivity, Constraint, and Evidential Complexity. Two examples suggest that consensus conferences can readily satisfy Inclusivity and Evidential Complexity, but consensus conferences do not as easily satisfy Constraint. I end by discussing the relation between social inclusivity and the three desiderata
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
STETCF-4
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-07-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2014-10-22

Total views
185 ( #25,728 of 54,569 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #29,879 of 54,569 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.