Theological Implications of the Simulation Argument

Ars Disputandi 10:23-37 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Nick Bostrom’s Simulation Argument (SA) has many intriguing theological implications. We work out some of them here. We show how the SA can be used to develop novel versions of the Cosmological and Design Arguments. We then develop some of the affinities between Bostrom's naturalistic theogony and more traditional theological topics. We look at the resurrection of the body and at theodicy. We conclude with some reflections on the relations between the SA and Neoplatonism (friendly) and between the SA and theism (less friendly).
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
STETIO-9
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-02-22
View other versions
Added to PP index
2010-10-31

Total views
262 ( #28,143 of 69,006 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
48 ( #16,943 of 69,006 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.