Theological Implications of the Simulation Argument

Ars Disputandi 10:23-37 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Nick Bostrom’s Simulation Argument (SA) has many intriguing theological implications. We work out some of them here. We show how the SA can be used to develop novel versions of the Cosmological and Design Arguments. We then develop some of the affinities between Bostrom's naturalistic theogony and more traditional theological topics. We look at the resurrection of the body and at theodicy. We conclude with some reflections on the relations between the SA and Neoplatonism (friendly) and between the SA and theism (less friendly).

Author's Profile

Eric Steinhart
William Paterson University of New Jersey

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-10-31

Downloads
677 (#24,092)

6 months
150 (#24,248)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?