The normative structure of mathematization in systematic biology

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
We argue that the mathematization of science should be understood as a normative activity of advocating for a particular methodology with its own criteria for evaluating good research. As a case study, we examine the mathematization of taxonomic classification in systematic biology. We show how mathematization is a normative activity by contrasting its distinctive features in numerical taxonomy in the 1960s with an earlier reform advocated by Ernst Mayr starting in the 1940s. Both Mayr and the numerical taxonomists sought to formalize the work of classification, but Mayr introduced a qualitative formalism based on human judgment for determining the taxonomic rank of populations, while the numerical taxonomists introduced a quantitative formalism based on automated procedures for computing classifications. The key contrast between Mayr and the numerical taxonomists is how they conceptualized the temporal structure of the workflow of classification, specifically where they allowed meta-level discourse about difficulties in producing the classification
PhilPapers/Archive ID
STETNS-4
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-09-30
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Moving Past the Systematics Wars.Sterner, Beckett & Lidgard, Scott

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-06-06

Total views
57 ( #28,545 of 38,875 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #25,521 of 38,875 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.