On the Connection between Semantic Content and the Objects of Assertion

Philosophical Topics 45 (2):163-179 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The Rigidity Thesis states that no rigid term can have the same semantic content as a nonrigid one. Drawing on Dummett, Evans, and Lewis, Stanley rejects the thesis since it relies on an illicit identification of compositional semantic content and the content of assertion. I argue that Stanley’s critique of the Rigidity Thesis fails since it places constraints on assertoric content that cannot be satisfied by any plausible notion of content appropriately related to compositional semantic content. For similar reasons, I also challenge a recent two-dimensionalist defense of Stanley by Ninan. The moral is far-reaching: any theory that invokes a distinction between semantic and assertoric contents is unsatisfactory unless it can plausibly explain the connection between them.
ISBN(s)
0276-2080
PhilPapers/Archive ID
STOOTC-6
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-09-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Monsters and the Theoretical Role of Context.Brian Rabern & Derek Ball - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 98 (2):392-416.
Content in a Dynamic Context.Una Stojnić - 2019 - Noûs 53 (2):394-432.
Why Horizontalism.Kirk-Giannini, Cameron Domenico

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-10-16

Total views
99 ( #30,611 of 46,236 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
69 ( #10,556 of 46,236 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.