Realism v Equilibrism about Philosophy

Syzetesis 1 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstract: According to the realist about philosophy, the goal of philosophy is to come to know the truth about philosophical questions; according to what Helen Beebee calls equilibrism, by contrast, the goal is rather to place one’s commitments in a coherent system. In this paper, I present a critique of equilibrism in the form Beebee defends it, paying particular attention to her suggestion that various meta-philosophical remarks made by David Lewis may be recruited to defend equilibrism. At the end of the paper, I point out that a realist about philosophy may also be a pluralist about philosophical culture, thus undermining one main motivation for equilibrism.

Author's Profile

Daniel Stoljar
Australian National University

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-01

Downloads
522 (#26,970)

6 months
146 (#17,125)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?