Determining the best of all possible worlds

Journal of Value Inquiry 39 (1):37-47 (2005)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The concept of the best of all possible worlds is widely considered to be incoherent on the grounds that, for any world that might be termed the best, there is always another that is better. I note that underlying this argument is a conviction that the goodness of a world is determined by a single kind of good, the most plausible candidates for which are not maximizable. Against this I suggest that several goods may have to combine to determine the goodness of a world, and because of logical conflicts between them, the goods can be optimized to give a genuine best of all possible worlds.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
STRDTB
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-10-24
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Enneads.Plotinus,

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
51 ( #27,863 of 37,100 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #27,393 of 37,100 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.